« Micro Sport Japanese MP3 Player Is The Tiniest In The World!
LaCie Introduces New Flat Cable USB Design For Easy Storage And A Sense Of Style »

The folks over at MobileCrunch posed a very interesting question today, who should be held responsible when an accident is caused by a cell phone? The obvious answer would be the driver, right? Well, MobileCrunch gives us this example from an accident that happened in 2008: the family of the deceased is suing Sprint and Samsung, because they feel the wireless carrier and the phone manufacturer is responsible for the accident because driver was distracted by a phone call.

While I don’t agree with the decision to sue Sprint or Samsung, because ultimately the decision to turn on the phone is up to the driver, someone has to shoulder the blame. Even if this case is thrown out by a judge, it’ll be another story highlighting the dangers of using a cell phone while driving. Of course the next best thing to do from a car manufacturer’s point of view, would be to have bluetooth enabled in every car, but car manufacturer’s make millions from these accessories or “luxuries”, they’ll never make it standard. But even with Bluetooth, a driver can still get distracted. I’ve been there. My car had bluetooth enabled but many times when I have to talk to someone and drive long distances in high traffic areas, it gets tough and with young drivers out on the road, it makes it that much more dangerous.

What do you think? Who should ultimately be responsible for an accident stemming from cell phone usage in a car?


Rating:
(Avg: Need 5 votes)
 

 

« Micro Sport Japanese MP3 Player Is The Tiniest In The World!
LaCie Introduces New Flat Cable USB Design For Easy Storage And A Sense Of Style »

This blog post is popular on:

google.com

 

3 Comments

Dear Guest, please login to comment

Login with your ZiggyTek account

Create New Account | Forgot password?


Please keep the comments clean by not posting advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks. Terms of Use.

Having trouble registering? Try our non-javascript registration page.

AlexaNguyen said: the driver of course

the driver…
that isnt using the phone :P

The driver ofcourse. Why would someone try to sue the company for what they did?! It’s like the person who sue McDonalds’ for the coffee they spilled on themselves. They should not have gotten anything for what they did AFTER it was out of McDonald’s hands. I just hope the judge throws this case out of the court.

the driver of course

suggest a link

Follow Us


Tips

We love to hear from our users, so if you have anything you would like us to write about let us know by emailing us at tips@ziggytek.com.

MustRead


PopularBlogPosts

Categories


Archives


About ZiggyTek

ZiggyTek is more than a gadget blog - it's a gadget community. In addition to bringing you the updates on the newest gadgets around the world, we give you a venue to discuss amongst each other and ponder those nuances that make all the difference. Got a tip on a hot new product? Let us know! Do you own one of the gadgets we cover? Give us your own impressions! Just around for articles? Take your time!