Ningin | GirlyBubble | ZiggyTek | BlitzNation | Wirebot | FlauntMe | SwanDiary | Rekuru | CrazySingleLife | HTCYou | OMGHaute

The first part of this guide focuses on common LCD definitions, while this article provides an overview of the three major panel types used by LCDs, as well as the backlighting schemes and different inputs. For deeper reading, consult Wikipedia’s entry regarding the main LCD types.
1. TN (twisted nematic): Most commonly used on nearly every laptop ever made, budget desktop monitors, and some cheaper TVs, small screens like navigation systems and phones, TN panels are the most cost effective:
+ Cost of production
+ Fast pixel response time and low input lag
+ Good contrast ratios on good TN panels
- Poor vertical viewing angles and mediocre horizontal viewing angles
- Usually 6-bit color (262,144 colors) with dithering to mimic 16.7 million colors. Most TN panels are advertised as having 16.7 million colors, but beware that they are not capable of reproducing that many true colors
- Poor white and black reproduction, with whites appearing tinted and blacks slightly gray
- Due to the low price of most TN panels, the backlights are generally sub-par (see backlight section below)

2. IPS (in-plane switching): Found in the most expensive LCDs by Apple, Eizo, etc., IPS costs the most to manufacture but provides the best widest viewing angles and most accurate colors. There are several variations of IPS panels, including S-IPS (super), AS-IPS (advanced-super), and IPS-Pro:
+ True 16-bit color with 16.7 million
+ Usually has high color gamut (92% NTSC or better)
+ Best and most consistent vertical and horizontal viewing angles of all panels
+ Very good contrast ratios, with proper whites and deep blacks (AS-IPS has nearly as high contrast as the best VA panels)
+ Since most IPS LCDs cost a lot, they receive the best backlighting technology
- Cost of production
- Contrast is not as good as the best VA panels
- Slower pixel response time and higher input lag than TN or VA (S-IPS is faster than other IPS types)

3. VA (vertical alignment): Comes in many variations, such as MVA (multi-domain), PVA (patterned), S-MVA, S-PVA, etc, these panels are most prominently put into mainstream HDTVs and mid-range desktop monitors. Sharp also has a similar technology that is called ASV (advanced super view), which is sported by some of its Aquos TVs:
+ Though not always the case with cheaper VA panels, many good models have 16-bit color with 16.7 million
+ Usually has high color gamut (92% NTSC or better)
+ Good vertical and horizontal viewing angles (though not as consistent as IPS)
+ The best contrast ratios, with really white whites and deep blacks
+ Acceptable pixel response time and low lag on better models
- Slower pixel response time and higher input lag than the fastest TN panels
- Viewing angles not as consistent as IPS

In addition to the many different panel types that affect image quality, how an LCD is backlit also has an enormous influence on a display’s colors, sharpness, and lighting uniformity:
CCFL (cold cathode fluorescent lamp): these are slowly being replaced by LED, but CCFL has been around for a long time. They are in tube form, have to warm up before reaching full brightness, and begin losing their luminance slowly over time.
LED (light-emitting diode): more and more laptops are using LED due to the technology’s being more power efficient than CCFL. LEDs can also be brighter and enable LCD panels to produce higher contrast (up to 3,000,000:1 for dynamic contrast on high-end Samsung HDTVs) and higher color gamut (beyond 100% NTSC). Unlike CCFL, LEDs reach their maximum brightness almost immediately and barely fade as they age. Full-array LEDs are expensive to make because color and lighting uniformity is challenging. Cheaper LED backlights can sometimes have poorer brightness uniformity than CCFL.
Inputs:
1. HDMI (High-Definition Multimedia Interface): high bandwidth; carries sound and picture digitally; up to 8 channel, 192KHz audio; 48-bit color; HDMI 1.3 up to 2560×1600 resolution; HDMI 1.4 up to 4096×2160; used with digital video such as HDTVs, cable boxes, etc.,
2. DVI (Digital Visual Interface): the standard for computer digital picture; comes in single or dual-link format; resolution up to 3840 × 2400 depending on Hz,
3. DisplayPort: digital video and audio (though audio can be disabled); open-source, unlike HDMI, which charges royalty fees for usage; at 60Hz, resolution up to 2560 × 1600; 16-bit color; now the standard for business and professionals.
4. VGA (Video Graphics Array): analogue picture formerly the computing standard; not much to know about these other than that they are nearly irrelevant in today’s world.
5. Composite: once the high-end of video for TVs and still exists on some desktop monitors and most HDTVs.
* A note about HDCP (High-bandwidth Digital Content Protection): Intel implemented this digital copyright protection measure, which affects all digital video signal interfaces (HDMI, DisplayPort, etc.), video cards, LCDs, and Blu-Ray/DVD-players and ROMs. Ensure that all of your hardware is HDCP certified if you want to play DVD or Blu-Ray through your TV or monitor.
Whenever I use my properly calibrated 1080p Sharp Aquos with its S-PVA panel, 2000:1 static contrast, 100% NTSC color gamut, I need a long time to readjust to my MacBook Pro’s TN display. The whites on good LCDs make cheaper displays look like their whites are stained and other colors muted.
Categories :
Login with your ZiggyTek account
OR login with Facebook
Please keep the comments clean by not posting advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks.. Terms of Use.
Having trouble registering? Try our old registration page.
I think Plasmas were my enemy a few years back, but manufacturers fixed a lot of the problems cause they had no choice. $850 for the 50″ typical high quality plasma is a fantastic deal any way you put it.
^ Thats pretty ridiculous politics there. If it wasn’t bad already that PC monitors are getting the shortest straw, and now you tell me that OLED was delayed because it would plummet LCD prices… HELLOOO isnt that what the world needs? If LCD prices were dirt cheap, the conversion of blu ray owners would definitely increase ten fold. Thanks to the sales of FFXIII, HDTV sales went up. We need a lot more of these price drops to help the strugging economy!
Unfortunately the economy is at its lowest point, which in turn is the weakest link to technology acceptance.
Hey, Danny, I had a 2407 as well. Mine was a Samsung S-PVA (I believe), but I think Dell also sourced MVA LG panels for that model too. It’s a very nice display, but you are right that good HDTVs are simply much better because of their backlights and more sophisticated video processors. The fact that you can use them as monitors is a major bonus since desktop LCDs do not have built-in tuners unless they are specifically made for TV viewing.
These LED Samsung TVs are impressive indeed. On Boxing Day, we purchased a 50″ Samsung plasma, which is burning in nicely. I suggested against an LED LCD because they cost too much at this point, while the plasma is a great value for TV viewing.
I totally agree with you about TN panels. If only more companies would start using VA or even IPS for laptops. AFAIK, no consumer notebook in the world uses a non-TN panel.
One of my biggest disappointments of 2009 was the delay of OLED because it would drive LCD prices down. Maybe in 5 years, all laptops will use OLED.
Nice updated list, derek. Looks familiar but its also updated.
The problem with PC monitors vs. TVs are that the TVS have 100% of the funding available. My Sony Bravia vs. my Dell 2407WFP is one story, the black levels on the bravia as lot darker. All the special post processing, deinterlacing and enhancements, everything you need to seee an awesome pictures on the HDTVs and LCD monitors are quite stagnant.
I wish for TN panels to die. Somehow the corporations convinced people that TN is good and they flock to buy it like sheep..lol.
I’m thoroughly impressed by this years Samsung LED LCD models. So pretty! God, I only got my Bravia Xbr4 in 2007 and its chump change compared to it!!


saranghaesuju on Aug 13, 2010 03:50pm
AnabelStars on Aug 06, 2010 10:00pm
nearnine on Aug 26, 2010 10:00pm
Hoc on Sep 01, 2010 04:11pm
ndhaa on Aug 09, 2010 09:00pm
ndhaa on Aug 11, 2010 08:03pm
itsatlex on Aug 14, 2010 09:00pm
saranghaesuju on Aug 21, 2010 03:28pm
Hoc on Aug 15, 2010 06:00pm
LISARRHH on Aug 21, 2010 03:31pm
I think the main reason for Sony’s delay is because of financial cutbacks. As you know, current OLED displays are very small. R&D for large displays will cost Sony too much, considering how the company is still losing money on each PS3 Slim sold. Still, I am really excited about the future of OLED and hope that Samsung, LG, and Panasonic surprise us with something special by the end of 2010.